Re: Practical approaches for DOMError.type [was Re: Collisions with identifiers in DOMError.type]

From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:42:25 +0000 To: Ray Whitmer <ray@xmission.com> Cc: www-dom@w3.org Message-Id: <200504192342.25182.frans.englich@telia.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:57 GMT

On Monday 18 April 2005 13:21, Ray Whitmer wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Frans Englich wrote:
> > One question to that which might arise, is what kind of URI to use. The
> > common type URL is wrong, since it identifies physical files which "error
> > types" are not. Errors are abstract, and that's what the chosen URI type
> > should be suitable for to identify.
>
> I do not think that it is correct to say that using any type of URI in this
> case is wrong.

I agree that my statement was wrong; current practice clearly contradicts it 
as you say, to name one aspect. Well, another word in that debate, then.

Cheers,

		Frans