W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: i18n reviews of DOM 3 Core and Load&Save

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:42:28 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Johnny Stenback <jst@w3c.jstenback.com>, Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
Cc: "'www-dom@w3.org'" <www-dom@w3.org>, "'w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>

Hello Johnny,

Many thanks for the followup.

At 18:39 03/09/23 -0700, Johnny Stenback wrote:

>Francois Yergeau wrote:

>>We're still missing answers on our C10 and LS5.
>LS5 was dealt with and the spec was updated accordingly last week (or the 
>week before), but due to a cut n' paste error in the issues list, I forgot 
>to reply to the mailing list with the resolution of that issue.
>Reply now at:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2003JulSep/0236.html
>Sorry for that oversight.

Would it be possible to send the actual answer, in particular
if it is really short:

Francois Yergeau wrote:
 > LS5) In DOMSerializer, the contents of the encoding pseudo-attribute of the
 > XML (or text) declaration is underspecified.  It should be specified that
 > this MUST be the actual encoding that is used for output, whatever the
 > source that determined that was.

Agreed. The spec was clarified to state that when an XML decl is output,
the encoding is always included in the XML decl.

Regards,  Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:34 UTC