- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:42:28 -0400
- To: Johnny Stenback <jst@w3c.jstenback.com>, Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
- Cc: "'www-dom@w3.org'" <www-dom@w3.org>, "'w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Hello Johnny, Many thanks for the followup. At 18:39 03/09/23 -0700, Johnny Stenback wrote: >Francois Yergeau wrote: >>We're still missing answers on our C10 and LS5. > >LS5 was dealt with and the spec was updated accordingly last week (or the >week before), but due to a cut n' paste error in the issues list, I forgot >to reply to the mailing list with the resolution of that issue. > >Reply now at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2003JulSep/0236.html > >Sorry for that oversight. Would it be possible to send the actual answer, in particular if it is really short: >>>> Francois Yergeau wrote: > LS5) In DOMSerializer, the contents of the encoding pseudo-attribute of the > XML (or text) declaration is underspecified. It should be specified that > this MUST be the actual encoding that is used for output, whatever the > source that determined that was. Agreed. The spec was clarified to state that when an XML decl is output, the encoding is always included in the XML decl. >>>> Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:53:07 UTC