W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: i18n reviews of DOM 3 Core and Load&Save

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:42:28 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030924104010.05b570f8@localhost>
To: Johnny Stenback <jst@w3c.jstenback.com>, Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
Cc: "'www-dom@w3.org'" <www-dom@w3.org>, "'w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>

Hello Johnny,

Many thanks for the followup.

At 18:39 03/09/23 -0700, Johnny Stenback wrote:

>Francois Yergeau wrote:

>>We're still missing answers on our C10 and LS5.
>
>LS5 was dealt with and the spec was updated accordingly last week (or the 
>week before), but due to a cut n' paste error in the issues list, I forgot 
>to reply to the mailing list with the resolution of that issue.
>
>Reply now at:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2003JulSep/0236.html
>
>Sorry for that oversight.

Would it be possible to send the actual answer, in particular
if it is really short:

 >>>>
Francois Yergeau wrote:
 > LS5) In DOMSerializer, the contents of the encoding pseudo-attribute of the
 > XML (or text) declaration is underspecified.  It should be specified that
 > this MUST be the actual encoding that is used for output, whatever the
 > source that determined that was.

Agreed. The spec was clarified to state that when an XML decl is output,
the encoding is always included in the XML decl.
 >>>>


Regards,  Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:53:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:57 GMT