Mikko Honkala wrote: > 3. 1.4 Convenience Interfaces should be made mandatory > > Why are these interfaces optional? If the claim is right that they are > just convenience methods, they should be trivial to implement. For users > it will be a pain to check whether an implementation supports these > interfaces. Please fix this by making them mandatory. The DOM WG disagrees with this, and chose to not make these interfaces mandatory. However, the DOM WG also decided to completely drop these interfaces from the LS spec, please see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2003JulSep/0210.html for more details. > > > [1] DOM3 LS > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-DOM-Level-3-LS-20030619/ > > -- jstReceived on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 14:16:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2007 00:17:16 GMT