The usage of "level 0" to refer to the pre-standardization DHTML APIs has been colloquial usage for years now -- note the date on the document you cite. Nobody else has seemed to be offended by the term, or to read it as implying endorsement for any particular product. If anyone is really "taking DOM-0 as standard", then they haven't read the DOM Recommendations and changing the DOM's glossary probably isn't going to change their minds. I agree that the term is slightly unfortunate, but I don't think changing it at this late date is either necessary or sufficient. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM ResearchReceived on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 15:17:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:56 GMT