W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2002

Please use the 'To' field and not the 'CC' field for the www-dom email address

From: urs muff <umuff@quark.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:54:45 -0700
Message-ID: <52F1AA641803D611B73B00508B12456F4858D9@denver.quark.com>
To: "'Joseph Kesselman'" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>, rayw@netscape.com
Cc: Www-Dom <www-dom@w3.org>
This makes it easier to use an Outlook filter on it.  Otherwise I have to
move those messages manually, which is very annoying.

Thanks a lot for your understanding.

- URS C. MUFF
SOFTWARE ENGINEER	- R&D / XPRESS
UMUFF@QUARK.COM	- X6360
+1 (303) 894 3360

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joseph Kesselman [mailto:keshlam@us.ibm.com] 
Sent:	Friday, March 22, 2002 11:50 AM
To:	rayw@netscape.com
Cc:	Thierry Kormann; W3c-Svg-Wg; Www-Dom; Arnaud Le Hors; Philippe Le
Hégaret
Subject:	Re: SVG WG is asking for feedback - event propagation


On Friday, 03/22/2002 at 10:13 PST, rayw@netscape.com (Ray Whitmer) wrote:
>  In some cases it would violate security  to permit them to even be
manually bridged

If the DOM Event APIs are exposed, I don't see any way to prevent a
relationship from being established manually -- at least not within the
scope of the DOM as currently designed.

This sounds like an issue for a security-aware subclass of the DOM, and I
don't think that flavor is even on the Open Issues List yet. It may come
closest to the read-only DOM proposal, or perhaps the transactional
proposal... but I think one can make a good case for it being best left as
something for higher-level code to define and deal with, since different
contexts may have significantly different concerns.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 13:55:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:55 GMT