> The change appeared to occur between then 7 March 2000 and > 20 May 2000 drafts. The language is pretty explicit, the current > Xerces-J (and gnu whatever) implementation is consistent with > the 7 March draft and inconsistent with the 20 May and eventual > recommendation. Makes sense. Both the "DOM2" and Xerces implementations had been rarin' to go for a while by then. That 10 May (not 20 May :) CR was number three or four in a long series. The question then is _why_ this changed. It wasn't broken, or else multiple implementations couldn't have been ready... - DaveReceived on Sunday, 19 August 2001 00:39:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:54 GMT