W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: "Latest Version" link to DOM Level 1 2nd Edition

From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:16:38 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001208111444.00cf9950@mail.webgeek.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: www-dom@w3.org
I think perhaps then, the terminology could be clarified. When I see a link 
on a document that says "latest version", I read that as the *latest 
version of the document I'm currently looking at*, whether it be a draft, 
CR, PR, or Rec. If it's to point back to the latest *Rec*, that should be 
specified.

(I further think the term and linking habits are managed differently across 
working groups, leading to some of the confusion)

Best,

Ann

t 08:35 PM 12/7/00 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>Ann Navarro wrote:
> >
> > The "latest version" link points back to the 1st edition Rec, not the
> > latest version of the working draft for 2nd Edition.
>
>And this is normal. The DOM Level 1 REC is still the latest version of
>DOM Level 1. Don't make any expectations on the second edition of DOM
>Level 1 at that stage.
>
>Philippe



---
Ann Navarro, Author and Chief Geek
WebGeek, Inc. http://www.webgeek.com
Now Available! - XHTML By Example -
http://www.webgeek.com/books/xhtmlbyexample/
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 11:16:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:48 GMT