Blaine Brodie wrote: > Hello Philippe, > Ok, I'd like to confirm my understanding of what you are saying with a > concrete > example. In the current SVG spec there exists a CSS property called > 'stroke-dasharray' (I'm quoting SVG because this is the only concrete > example I can > find.). The representation for this property is either "ident or list of > lengths". The syntax > for this property is 'none | <dasharray> | inherit'. > Assume I obtain this CSS value from the getPropertyCssValue() method... > > value = style.getPropertyCssValue("stroke-dasharray"); > value.getCssText(); //returns "none" > value.getValueType(); //returns CSS_PRIMITIVE_VALUE > CSSPrimitiveValue pValue = (CSSPrimitiveValue)value; > pValue.getPrimitiveType(); //returns CSS_IDENT > > pValue.setCssText("5 3 2 5 3 2"); //Throws SYNTAX_ERR exception No, it doesn't return a SYNTAX_ERR since, according to the attached property, the syntax is correct. > However, if the above behavior is not correct and a SYNTAX_ERR exception > is not thrown > (ie the value type is changed), then can you please tell me which of the > following behavior > would be considered correct... > > pValue.getCssText(); //returns "5 3 4 5 3 2" > pValue.getValueType(); //returns CSS_VALUE_LIST > pValue.getPrimitiveType(); //returns CSS_UNKNOWN The result of pValue.getPrimitiveType is undefined since it is no longer a primivite value. From a Java programmer point of view, it could throw a java.lang.IllegalStateException (for example). In ECMAScript, you might get an unknown property error. In any case, this is outside the scope of the specification. PhilippeReceived on Monday, 26 June 2000 14:49:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:52 GMT