W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: DOM 2 Event question...

From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:29:54 -0400
To: "Glenn Adams" <gadams@vgi.com>
cc: Sam.Christiansen@trilogy.com, www-dom@w3.org
Message-ID: <85256906.00659E8D.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
>Or does this text say "in addition to setting an attribute recognized to
>represent an event handler, that implementors may/should/must (?) *also*
>create and register an equivalent EventListener on the node"?

I believe that's the intent. The attribute is an attribute; that's standard
DOM behavior. A specialized DOM which wants to interpret setting this
attribute as a request to bind a script to an event can do so as a side
effect.


______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2000 14:30:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:47 GMT