W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: Transactional DOM

From: Alex Rojkov <arojkov@communicate.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 08:22:16 -0700
Message-ID: <8171AC6D0493D311A98100508B55F34E2A7392@mail.communicate.com>
To: "'www-dom@w3.org'" <www-dom@w3.org>
I think we could have the same transactional model as Oracle has.
So we can set up savepoints and then make rollback to any of those
savepoints.

Say we have a transaction that sets savePoints like
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
|startTransation():-*->savePoint(1):-*->:savePoint(2):-*->...savePoint(n)
|
|                                                <------------rollback();
|
|                                                |commit();
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
than we make a rollback to savePoint2.
Commit can be made at any time after startTransaction() was issued.
I think this would work very well for me.

Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Champion [mailto:Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 1:30 PM
To: www-dom@w3.org
Subject: Re: Transactional DOM



----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rojkov" <arojkov@communicate.com>
To: <www-dom@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 4:21 PM
Subject: Transactional DOM

> I am wondering if it makes sence to add transactional capability in DOM.

Definitely someday; this is not in the requirements for the Level 3
Load/Save functionality, but there are at least some of us who have
expressed interest in the past.

If you could elaborate on your needs and suggest some features, that would
help.
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2000 11:22:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:47 GMT