W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: 3 comments for the 0720 DOM spec...

From: ANOQ of the Sun <anoq@vip.cybercity.dk>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 21:17:32 +0200
Message-ID: <35D48D4C.FC6E1269@vip.cybercity.dk>
To: Berlin Design <design@berlin-consortium.org>, DOM List <www-dom@w3.org>
John Cowan wrote:
> Not really.  It's one thing to extend an interface by adding new
> elements; that's routine.  But an enum is a class, without the
> feature of extensibility.

If an implementation is recompiled, won't it conform to the
same "interface" of the enum class, even though values have
been added?

> (At least not in C--;

Is this a language? If it doesn't have the same type of
enum as defined in the IDL-specs, it will possibly not
be mapped to a "C-- enum", but rather to a set of integers
or something in "C--".

> You tollerday donsk?

Ja, jeg taler dansk! ;)

ANOQ of the Sun / Johnny Andersen

E-Mail:   anoq@vip.cybercity.dk or anoq@berlin-consortium.org
Homepage: http://users.cybercity.dk/~ccc25861/
Received on Friday, 14 August 1998 15:43:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:04 UTC