W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-xpath@w3.org > May 2000

Re: nasty namespace issue (was RE: Is minimalism a goal?)

From: Michael Champion <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 09:10:32 -0400
Message-ID: <007201bfb8ee$cacc7f30$a20c1e18@WORKGROUP>
To: <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus" <Scott_Boag@lotus.com>
To: <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: nasty namespace issue (was RE: Is minimalism a goal?)



> No.  MSXML's approach is worse than not compliant.  It is wrong... if you
> try to fix it later, you break applications that used the broken approach.

What exactly is "wrong" about MS's XSL interface?  Would "Joe Webmaster"
care, or is this a more theoretical standards compliance issue?

Can it be addressed in an "ultra minimal" API or a "minimal" API?
Received on Monday, 8 May 2000 09:11:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:43:07 UTC