Re: nasty namespace issue (was RE: Is minimalism a goal?)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus" <Scott_Boag@lotus.com>
To: <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2000 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: nasty namespace issue (was RE: Is minimalism a goal?)



> No.  MSXML's approach is worse than not compliant.  It is wrong... if you
> try to fix it later, you break applications that used the broken approach.

What exactly is "wrong" about MS's XSL interface?  Would "Joe Webmaster"
care, or is this a more theoretical standards compliance issue?

Can it be addressed in an "ultra minimal" API or a "minimal" API?