W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-xpath@w3.org > May 2000

Re: [dom-xpath] XPath or? (was RE: Announcing www-dom-xpath@w3.org)

From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 17:05:17 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000502170327.00b37320@pop.mindspring.com>
To: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@softwareag.com>, <www-dom-xpath@w3.org>
At 04:53 PM 5/2/00 -0400, Michael Champion wrote:

>Aha! I think we all agree on this ... and the main reason the DOM WG had
>little interest in the XPath extensions is because most think it really
>should be someone else's baby.  BUT the Query WG is at least a year or so
>away from a Recommendation, and no WG is currently working on XPath (that I
>know of), so the choices now are a) nothing happens for a year and we all
>hope that the Query WG does what we want; b) the DOM defines an XPath
>extension; or c) some ad-hoc group proposes an interim "standard" (a la SAX,
>perhaps) and encourages vendors to support it.  I think this mailing list is
>considering b) vs c) ... and a) is the default, I guess.

I think I agree with your analysis.

And unfortunately, the default will result in dozens of proprietary 
interfaces that all do the same thing.

Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2000 17:02:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:43:07 UTC