Andrew Clover wrote: >Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com> wrote: > > > >>mark the tests that fail as requiring validation. >> >> > >In this case there will be no test that attribute defaulting/normalisation >works at all; it is my understanding that a non-validating parser should >still respect attribute declarations given in the internal subset. > >Why not simply copy the significant <!ATTLIST>s from the DTD into the >internal subset of staff[NS].xml? This is how I persuaded my non-validating >implementation to pass L1/L2 Core. > > > I'd consider that a substantial enough change to a test that it should be introduced as a new test instead of a tweak to an existing test, especially since any change to staff.xml is really a change to almost all tests.Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 10:47:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:48 GMT