W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Release, updates and documentation

From: Jason Brittsan <jasonbri@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:33:39 -0800
Message-ID: <D5C70EA9DF70694391969A1494875A120616B164@red-msg-05.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Yes, I believe so.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris@ontologicon.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:22 PM
To: Jason Brittsan
Cc: www-dom-ts@w3.org
Subject: Re: Release, updates and documentation

Good idea, is it reasonable to start the history section as per next 
release? (we haven't got any changes to previous releases yet)


On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 08:23 , Jason Brittsan wrote:

> It would also be extremely useful to add a "History" section to
> the deltas between each released version.  This should also include
> changes to the test cases.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris@ontologicon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:52 AM
> To: www-dom-ts@w3.org
> Subject: Release, updates and documentation
> OK, it looks as if we only have one issue left; JsUnit. While being
> resolved, I'll do the following:
> Check index.htm for spelling, links and the extra info Curt indicated
> need looking into.
> Update the DOM TS page at W3C, I'll include a "Releases" section
> pointing to the distributions (will only consist of this to begin
> hopefully DOM L1 HTML fairly soon, DOM L2 after that)
> Curt, let me manually put all the generated files in a
> DOMTSL1Core-20020212 directory and zip it for posting on W3C machinery
> and let's look into automating this task too after that.
> Again, JsUnit still pending, but the above needs to be done in any
> (except for the obvious in case we decide against releasing).
> /Dimitris
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 19:34:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:04 UTC