W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-di@w3.org > June 2005

Re: [DPF]Event categories underspecified in section 5

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:52:39 -0700
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Keith Waters <kwaters@ftrd.us>
Cc: www-di@w3.org
Message-id: <>

I agree with Bjoern, and would add that:

* The DIWG and DI community should send their requirements and recommended 
changes right away.
* OMA has expressed a similar desire to collaborate on DOM3 Events. Their 
objective is to ensure that the event model encompasses all of the 
different user interaction models available on today's mobile devices (and 
tomorrow's to the degree that we can see into the future).

Jon Ferraiolo
Adobe & SVGWG

At 03:32 PM 6/25/2005, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>* Keith Waters wrote:
> >[http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-DPF-20041122/]
> >The DPF team would like to inherit the DOM 3 event interfaces,
> >however at the time of this writing the DOM 3 events was a Note vs a
> >specification. As such, we decided to defer inheriting the interfaces
> >until a W3C group picked up the DOM 3 interfaces and moved on from a
> >Note stage to a draft stage.
>The SVG Working Group is chartered to advance DOM Level 3 Events to
>Recommendation status. Rather than re-inventing parts of DOM Level 3
>Events, the Working Group should coordinate with the SVG WG and adopt
>DOM Level 3 Events directly.
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2005 19:53:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:54:24 UTC