W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Environment settings objects vs global objects

From: Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:19:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKBxTc+g+4C2WuSAyTuhLn+VSzqLLAnEc28udE9ohJmrh-eKJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, Brian Terlson <Brian.Terlson@microsoft.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
If the only reason for this separation was the theoretical possibility of a
different scripting language on the web, I'm all for merging them. The
cross-origin object spec uses a bunch of ES-specific MOP stuff anyway.

bholley

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There's quite a few of concepts that seem to map 1:1 to globals. I'm
> wondering if I should try to get rid of environment settings objects
> in favor of adding its internal slots to global objects. I could also
> add them to Realms I suppose, if that was preferred. Not sure what the
> current thinking of Realms vs globals is. I guess Realms might make
> more sense if we're getting that Realm object.
>
> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/167 has some extra words.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 20:20:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 21 September 2015 20:20:39 UTC