Re: PubReq: new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

Thank you guys,

As Shadow DOM spec editor, I'm okay to use the wording which
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-appmanifest-20131217/ uses.

Can I assume that someone will change the wording and install the document
to TR?
I am wondering whether I have to update https://w3c.github.io/
webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/  again or not so that
someone could copy the document from there.




On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Yves,
>
> This document will not be published tomorrow as I don't see this resolved
> 1 day prior to the publication.
>
> Can you re-stage it for next week (either Tuesday or Thursday at your
> convenience) once this is resolved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jérémie
>
>
> On 11/06/14 09:58, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>  [+Ian]
>>>
>>> Ian,
>>>
>>> Could you give us a pointer to the decision explaining the approved
>>> wording please?
>>>
>>
>> This thread in April is an attempt to build support for updated pubrules
>> and best practices:
>>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2014AprJun/0001
>>
>> I have not had time to return to that thread but should have time now
>> that we are past the AC meeting.
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>> Meanwhile, Art, I suggest changing the document to include the approved
>>> wording. Doing so (and keeping the discussion open) will ensure the
>>> document can be published tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jérémie
>>>
>>> On 10/06/14 14:14, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems to me the essence of the two text blocks is effectively the
>>>> same. I think it would be helpful, if, for each of the four sentences, you
>>>> identified the specific part(s) that is not acceptable (and cite the
>>>> document that shows why WebApps text is not acceptable). Would you please
>>>> do this?
>>>>
>>>> -Thanks, Art
>>>>
>>>> On 6/10/14 2:07 PM, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Yves and Art,
>>>>>
>>>>> This document cannot be published as is because of the bottom overlay
>>>>> saying:
>>>>>
>>>>>     This Version of this Document Is Obsolete and Has Been Replaced
>>>>>     This version of the specification is obsolete and has been
>>>>> replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/
>>>>> webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do
>>>>> not attempt to implement this version of the specification. Do not
>>>>> refer to this version except as a historical artifact.
>>>>>
>>>>> For wording, you can use the approved text that can be found on the
>>>>> appmanifest specification [1]:
>>>>>
>>>>>     THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS!
>>>>>     This specification is for review and not for implementation! For
>>>>> the latest updates, including important bug fixes, please look at the
>>>>> draft on GitHub instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if you have any question.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jérémie
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-appmanifest-20131217/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/06/14 11:01, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  [+Yves, +Xiaoqian]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yves or Xiaoqian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you install the document in TR please?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Done,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 10/06/14 09:35, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WebApps would like to publish a new WD of the (standalone) Shadow
>>>>>>>> DOM spec on June 12:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/
>>>>>>>> WD-shadow-dom-20140612/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Thanks, AB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Hayato