W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2014

Re: PubReq: new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

From: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:40:20 -0400
Message-ID: <5398DAD4.6070204@w3.org>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, team-webapps@w3.org, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Cindy Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
Hi Yves,

This document will not be published tomorrow as I don't see this resolved 1 day prior to the publication.

Can you re-stage it for next week (either Tuesday or Thursday at your convenience) once this is resolved?

Thanks,

Jérémie

On 11/06/14 09:58, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
> On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> [+Ian]
>>
>> Ian,
>>
>> Could you give us a pointer to the decision explaining the approved wording please?
>
> This thread in April is an attempt to build support for updated pubrules and best practices:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2014AprJun/0001
>
> I have not had time to return to that thread but should have time now that we are past the AC meeting.
>
> Ian
>
>>
>> Meanwhile, Art, I suggest changing the document to include the approved wording. Doing so (and keeping the discussion open) will ensure the document can be published tomorrow.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jérémie
>>
>> On 10/06/14 14:14, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> It seems to me the essence of the two text blocks is effectively the same. I think it would be helpful, if, for each of the four sentences, you
>>> identified the specific part(s) that is not acceptable (and cite the document that shows why WebApps text is not acceptable). Would you please
>>> do this?
>>>
>>> -Thanks, Art
>>>
>>> On 6/10/14 2:07 PM, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>>> Hi Yves and Art,
>>>>
>>>> This document cannot be published as is because of the bottom overlay saying:
>>>>
>>>>     This Version of this Document Is Obsolete and Has Been Replaced
>>>>     This version of the specification is obsolete and has been replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do
>>>> not attempt to implement this version of the specification. Do not refer to this version except as a historical artifact.
>>>>
>>>> For wording, you can use the approved text that can be found on the appmanifest specification [1]:
>>>>
>>>>     THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS!
>>>>     This specification is for review and not for implementation! For the latest updates, including important bug fixes, please look at the
>>>> draft on GitHub instead.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you have any question.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jérémie
>>>>
>>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-appmanifest-20131217/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/06/14 11:01, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> [+Yves, +Xiaoqian]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yves or Xiaoqian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you install the document in TR please?
>>>>>
>>>>> Done,
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/06/14 09:35, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>>>>> WebApps would like to publish a new WD of the (standalone) Shadow DOM spec on June 12:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Thanks, AB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 22:40:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:31 UTC