- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:47:18 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:19 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> fantasai and Tab wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rossen!
>> Tab and I were working on edits wrt grid-auto-flow: none and had an
>> alternative proposal:
>> 1. Don't add 'none' back. Keep 'grid-auto-flow:rows' as the initial
>> value.
>> 2. Add, for those use cases, a 'stack' value that stacks items into
>> the first implicitly-empty slot. Either
>> a. First slot without explicitly-positioned items into which
>> the auto-positioned item fits, or
>> b. First slot without explicitly-positioned items into which
>> all the auto-positioned items fit
>> 3. To address how that empty slot is found, either
>> a. Use [rows|columns] instead of 'auto' in 'grid-auto-position'
>> to define the search direction
>> b. Allow combining 'stack' with [rows|columns]:
>> grid-auto-flow: [rows|columns] || stack
>> 4. For compat with Win8, give Win8 apps a default UA stylesheet with
>> * { grid-auto-flow: -ms-none; }
>> or
>> * { grid-auto-position: 1 / 1; }
>>
>> We feel #2 is better behavior in general, because it doesn't by default
>> overwrite things that are explicitly placed in the grid, and because it
>> makes it easy to auto-stack items into slots other than 1-1, for layouts
>> that would prefer to stack items into a different grid slot. But if that's
>> not compatible with Win8 apps, the UA rule gives Win8 apps the exact same
>> behavior as before.
>>
>> If you really need to keep 'none' instead of '-ms-none' as the keyword for
>> compat reasons, we could possibly still add a simple "none" value that
>> does *just* put things in 1/1, no questions asked.
>>
>> ~fantasai and TJ
>
>
> Rossen wrote:
>>
>>
>> [Wrt #2] I'd prefer 'deck' in this case. Because in XAML, 'stack' already
>> means, roughly, flexbox, while 'deck' refers to the behavior we're talking
>> about.
Yo, Rossen! We'd like to close this issue at the f2f. Which of these
options is MS okay with?
~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 22:48:07 UTC