W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2013

RE: UI Events question

From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:06:36 +0000
To: Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик) <garykac@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B3853BDA1C1@TK5EX14MBXW602.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Oops. I can adjust those auto-generated links...

On DOM3... As Gary mentioned, we're focusing on the new stuff in UI Events. There was a lot of legacy prose that probably doesn't need to carry forward, especially given that most of the raw event model stuff is in DOM4. I suppose as we add/adjust functionality from the other UI Events, they will be added in as needed. We may need a more coherent story than this for FPWD, but for now, this is working OK.

From: Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик) [mailto:garykac@google.com]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:57 AM
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Travis Leithead; www-archive
Subject: Re: UI Events question

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl<mailto:annevk@annevk.nl>> wrote:

The links in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/d4e/raw-file/tip/source_respec.htm

404. I was planning to link to this specification from DOM, but I'm
not sure where to point now.

The rename from "d4e" -> "uievents" seems to have broken the auto-generated links at the top.  It looks like we'll have to move the repository from hg/d4e to hg/uievents, but perhaps Travis knows a more clever way of resolving this.

Also, will this specification include all
the prose from DOM Level 3 Events that's not superseded by DOM? That's
the plan right?

At the moment, we're focusing on new content, but I'm not against merging the DOM3 content.
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 18:07:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:17 UTC