W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Methods of working: WebRTC WG and the PeerConnection spec

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:23:07 +0200
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D6147C13C57B@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>
Of course we will need to discuss between Harald, Francois and myself (as well as getting the new WG to agree), but spontaneously this feels like a very good way forward.

A question: filing bugs feels like something you do when the problem (and possibly the solution) is quite clear. But would not a bug filing in many cases be preceeded by a discussion, especially for stuff like WebRTC where new concepts (like peer-to-peer communication) and solutions are introduced? I think there will be a need for a lot of discussions (presumably via mail) as we move forward.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] 
Sent: den 12 maj 2011 21:16
To: Michael[tm] Smith
Cc: Harald Alvestrand; Stefan Håkansson LK; Francois Daoust; www-archive@w3.org
Subject: Re: Methods of working: WebRTC WG and the PeerConnection spec

On Fri, 13 May 2011, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, 2011-05-12 18:46 +0000:
> > The HTML working group at the W3C has been using W3C's Bugzilla 
> > instance to handle HTML spec feedback, which has also worked well; 
> > I'd be happy to handle PeerConnection feedback through that 
> > mechanism as well. I imagine Mike would be happy to set up a 
> > component for us if we want to do that. There's already a number of 
> > bugs on the topic filed there.
> Yeah, it's easy to set up new components in bugzilla, and our 
> experiences with using it in the HTML WG have shown that a lot of 
> implementors and QA engineers from browser-dev teams and such like 
> having a bug system available as a choice for providing comments and 
> questions, and will make good use of it if it's provided.

Cool, thanks Mike.

One other advantage with using Bugzilla, come to think of it, is that the bug filing mechanism in the WHATWG specs are already set up to automatically file bugs in the right components in the W3C Bugzilla.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 11:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:46 UTC