W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Methods of working: WebRTC WG and the PeerConnection spec

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
cc: Harald Alvestrand <hta@google.com>, Stefan H¸«©kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105121914450.16840@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, 2011-05-12 18:46 +0000:
> 
> > The HTML working group at the W3C has 
> > been using W3C's Bugzilla instance to handle HTML spec feedback, which has 
> > also worked well; I'd be happy to handle PeerConnection feedback through 
> > that mechanism as well. I imagine Mike would be happy to set up a 
> > component for us if we want to do that. There's already a number of bugs 
> > on the topic filed there.
> 
> Yeah, it's easy to set up new components in bugzilla, and our 
> experiences with using it in the HTML WG have shown that a lot of 
> implementors and QA engineers from browser-dev teams and such like 
> having a bug system available as a choice for providing comments and 
> questions, and will make good use of it if it's provided.

Cool, thanks Mike.

One other advantage with using Bugzilla, come to think of it, is that the 
bug filing mechanism in the WHATWG specs are already set up to 
automatically file bugs in the right components in the W3C Bugzilla.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2011 19:16:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:36 GMT