W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2011

Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:43:40 +0900
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <20110202084340.GB83831@sideshowbarker>
Hi Steve,

> @2011-02-02 08:31 +0000:
> hi mike, thanks for your detailed explanation.
> While i consider that the decision by the chairs decision was not based on
> any explicitly stated process rule. It is now clear that the rule is:
> Once an issue is closed it loses its status as a pre last call issue

Yeah, I think that's a close enough description.

> The term prejudicial was meant to refer the effect upon the issue's pre-last
> call status. As in the issue is closed with prejudice (it will no longer be
> cosnidered as a pre last call issue)

OK, I see.

> I will not pursue this any further as it will be a waste of time.

All right


Michael[tm] Smith
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 08:43:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:45 UTC