W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Call for a poll of the html wg on removal of hgroup was Re: review of hgroup element prior to last call.

From: Edward O'Connor <hober0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:17:00 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTindjPOD+mpzxYEQqkjq4umzwZOhNz94Pvx_WR6x@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

Steve wrote:
> the only way to affect a change in the spec is via the
> usual escalation process.

Actually, the usual, and chronologically first way to affect change in
the spec is to put forth arguments for your position that the editor
finds compelling. The escalation process should only happen
occasionally, where rational discussion of the issue has ended with
irreconcilable differences.

The editor hasn't gotten to the recent <hgroup> feedback yet, so we're
still far, far before the escalation process will be invoked, *if it
gets invoked at all*. You seem to have written off the possibility
that the editor might adopt your proposal, which is a shame.

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:17:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:45 UTC