On 14 April 2011 22:20, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > For developer-facing non-normative documentation, the WHATWG is likely to > continue using the term "HTML5" for some time, but it really has nothing > to do with the W3C draft. I'm curious, and so hope you will answer a direct question - who gains what from maintaining confusion through contradictory/ambiguous naming? Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.nameReceived on Thursday, 14 April 2011 21:46:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:35 GMT