Forgot to copy www-archive. While you are not obligated to do so, I would like to request that www-archive be copied on any replies. - Sam Ruby On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > I'm sending this email based on a request from Ian: > > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-June/026896.html > > My request is very specifically scoped. Details can be found at [1] > and [2]. The short form is that a proposal made by Lachlan Hunt[3] > was adopted by the W3C WG based on a Call for Consensus[4], and this > resulted in a widening of the divergence[5] between the WHATWG and W3C > drafts. > > My request is that one of the following three actions be taken (listed > in order of preference): > > (1) that this divergence be eliminated, and that the WHATWG draft be > updated to reflect the consensus position. > > (2) that new information be presented[6] which would cause this > discussion to be reopened. > > (3) that the differences listed in the WHATWG draft be updated in two ways: > (a) to describe why the WHATWG felt it necessary to diverge in this > particular case > (b) to modify the description of the W3C position to be based on the > reasons given in Lachlan's proposal > > Thanks for your consideration in this matter. > > - Sam Ruby > > [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-June/026874.html > [2] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-June/026876.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/1107.html > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0562.html > [5] http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/commit-watchers-whatwg.org/2010/004270.html > [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGChairReopen >Received on Saturday, 26 June 2010 00:05:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:31 GMT