Re: vCard RDF NOTE - draft

On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:01, Toby Inkster wrote:

> It's certainly suboptimal, but seems to gel with how vCard-in-RDF is
> used in the wild. Perhaps we should steer producers of data in one
> direction, while noting to consumers that historically some people  
> have
> used the property differently.

So, what do you both recommend I do to the current draft?

> So for the example at hand:
>
> 	:Work rdfs:subClassOf [
> 		owl:unionOf (:Address :Label :Tel)
> 		] .

Is this OK Martin to meet your concern?

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA