W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2009

Re: vCard RDF NOTE - draft

From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:36:35 +1000
Message-ID: <739A7644-02D2-4C4A-9782-FAB312B045AF@nicta.com.au>
CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>

On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:01, Toby Inkster wrote:

> It's certainly suboptimal, but seems to gel with how vCard-in-RDF is
> used in the wild. Perhaps we should steer producers of data in one
> direction, while noting to consumers that historically some people  
> have
> used the property differently.

So, what do you both recommend I do to the current draft?

> So for the example at hand:
> 	:Work rdfs:subClassOf [
> 		owl:unionOf (:Address :Label :Tel)
> 		] .

Is this OK Martin to meet your concern?

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 06:42:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:36 UTC