W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2009

Re: vCard - Old vs. New?

From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:35:28 +1000
CC: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <13F9B922-52D3-4C09-A7F8-4215BCE4950D@nicta.com.au>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>

>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>  
> wrote:
>> And of course, since yesterday, we have to take Google's vcard  
>> ontology into
>> account:
>>
>> http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml

Oh Dear - yet another one!

>> And the rest of their ontologies into account, but they look like
> straightforward subset of the vCard ontology, and so on with reviewers
> etc, so I'm not concerned. What we really need to do is to move on
> getting certain prefixes for RDFa "reserved" by HTML5, sorting Hixie's
> meta-data proposal. I think, as well a good unified vocabulary hosting
> site/software endorsed by Yahoo!, Google, and W3C ideally.
> Hmmm.....organizationally, what do people think is the next step here?

Lets just focus one thing (for now)....a common vCard/RDF  
representation that we can widely public/size.

With this, hopefully, the likes of Google will reuse this vocab....


Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:49:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:24 GMT