- From: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:30:07 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, www-archive@w3.org
And of course, since yesterday, we have to take Google's vcard ontology into account: http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml Cheers, Peter Harry Halpin wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au> wrote: > >> On 12 May 2009, at 18:39, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> >>> If others amongst you will be there, why don't you get together and try >>> to make some progress there? I suggest the Social Web XG as a mechanism >>> for tracking this effort, even if the document surfaces as a SWIG Note, >>> since SWXG meets regularly with minutes, agendas etc while SWIG doesn't >>> have that kind of a mechanism. Enough SWIG folk are engaged in this >>> discussion (now and over the years) that I don't see a problem with >>> doing the update under SWIG. >>> > > I'll be at Heraklion for ESWC2009, and also of courese in SWXG. Would > like to merge, will have to re-read both vCard Notes and try to see > what way they can be combined. Off the top of my head, it appears the > first Note demonstrates the use of RDF containers, while the second > aims for simplicity. We could just aim for simplicity while still > showing how RDF containers can be used to help deal with the complex > cases. The main keys will be to normalise property names and deal with > any actual incompatibilities, which I assume are few. > > >> Great ... see u there! >> >> Cheers... Renato Iannella >> NICTA >> >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 09:32:12 UTC