W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2009

Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:10:56 +0100
Message-ID: <49C91420.4090602@malform.no>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
+ www-archive
- public-html

Boris Zbarsky 2009-03-24 15.52:
> Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>> Other than the phrase "poster child", which part was a cliche, exactly?
>> Nothing. That was the cliche.
> So in other words you decide to ignore everything else I said because I used that phrase?
> I wonder why I'm even bothering with this discussion. 

Does it seem as if I ignore what you say? I don't think that is a 
fair claim. By "deaf" I only described what happens when the 
wording is so strong that it takes away the attention from what 
one tries to convey.

I had hoped there weren't more to add. But since you force me to 
comment more: I only tried to hint that PC (Poster Child) is a 
controversal idiom - please don't use it. If by PC you only meant 
"bad example" (aPNG) then PC seems like a distracting overkill.

At least, it isn't clear to me what you meant by PC. If you feel 
adding something about PC, then I hope you will focus on 
clarifying what you meant. Or else, I suggest that we drop the 
poster child debate.
leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 17:11:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:28 UTC