Robert Sayre wrote: > > But, frankly, I haven't given much thought to the process details > going forward. I'm pretty sure we can do better than a process one > might term "Autocratic Decisions Made Based On Secret Feedback, > Followed By Condescending Denials Of Autocratic Decision Making, > Characterization Of Dissent As 'Force', And Cynical Patent FUD". My recommendation: spend more time writing spec text, and less time characterizing the contributions of others. Seriously. 80% of the current document is not only good, it is very, very good. An even with your "no inventions" approach, upwards of 60% of this material is ready to be standardized now. > And, if someone has a better way, they can write a document too. +1 > - Rob - Sam RubyReceived on Saturday, 4 July 2009 03:34:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:25 GMT