Rob Sayre wrote: > >> It >> attempts to put an immediate spec-writing and working-group benefit >> (namely, being able to move forward without objections) ahead of the >> user. >> This, IMHO, is unacceptable (and is counter to our design principles). > > I don't think this kind of argument is productive. Using it, someone > claiming to represent users could challenge any edit to the document. In > other words, it's "wrapping yourself in the flag". This is precisely why I prefer to talk in terms of specific proposals. - Sam RubyReceived on Saturday, 21 February 2009 03:39:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 February 2009 03:39:58 GMT