W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2009

Re: WG comments, Working Drafts, and Last Call -- clarification please?

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:51:17 -0700
Cc: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-id: <E8737D08-FE66-485C-81CF-D5B05071FB80@apple.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Aug 6, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:33 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> [...] I disagree with you slightly on
>> the order of things though. My understanding is: technically you can
>> only Formally Object to a decision, not to a proposal. Thus, while  
>> you
>> can declare the intent to raise a Formal Objection in advance of a
>> decision, you can't actually enter one until the decision is made.
> Yeah, I've seen lots of chairs work that way, but it makes no
> sense, to me... how can the chair decide whether the question
> carries or not if s/he doesn't know how many objections there are
> and how serious they are?
> I sometimes wish the process document were more clear on that.

The way I see it: you can register your disagreement, and how serious  
it is, before a decision is made. Even to the point of saying, "I feel  
so strongly that if the decision goes against me I will Formally  

If the decision carries anyway, Formal Objection is your chance to  
register the fact that you still strongly disagree, are proceeding  
under protest, and wish to have the decision reviewed by the Director  
at the next relevant transition. Essentially, it is an escalation  
mechanism if you truly can't live with the WG decision.

Anyway, not a hugely important point. Ideally, we can avoid a high  
volume of formal objections.

Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 19:51:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:34 UTC