please please please have a look at [1] and [2] (they are really short pieces) and let us know your comments. i think we have exactly the same use-case but may described differently. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF] cheers, shadi Dan Brickley wrote: > Hiya > > Expanding my comment from SWCG call: > > I had a use case in FOAF to be able to represent in RDF that xyz was the > concrete set of bytes we get by conneg as text/html, that abc was > another set of bytes we get by conneg as application/rdf+xml, and that > some other documents were the results of pgp signing one or the other of > those... > > http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/#base64ContentClass looks close, but > i've not reviewed it yet > > cheers > > Dan > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 14:47:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 October 2008 14:47:04 GMT