W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2008

Re: use case for having vocab for TAG-ish vocab to represent content negotiation

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:46:26 +0200
Message-ID: <48E63042.2000504@w3.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>

please please please have a look at [1] and [2] (they are really short 
pieces) and let us know your comments. i think we have exactly the same 
use-case but may described differently.
  [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/>
  [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF]

cheers,
   shadi


Dan Brickley wrote:
> Hiya
> 
> Expanding my comment from SWCG call:
> 
> I had a use case in FOAF to be able to represent in RDF that xyz was the 
> concrete set of bytes we get by conneg as text/html, that abc was 
> another set of bytes we get by conneg as application/rdf+xml, and that 
> some other documents were the results of pgp signing one or the other of 
> those...
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/#base64ContentClass looks close, but 
> i've not reviewed it yet
> 
> cheers
> 
> Dan
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 14:47:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:19 GMT