Re: An HTML language specification

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2008, at 21:12, Mark Baker wrote:
>
>> Defining the language in terms of an abstraction which isn't relevant to
>> all uses of HTML is IMO,
>> prima facie a bad idea.
>
> Would you accept an abstraction of "document tree"?

I'd accept any solution that could be understood by a layperson.

Mark.