W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2008

Re: tracker already has ternary state - RAISED

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:54:21 +0200
To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "James Graham" <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, www-archive@w3.org, "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, wai-liaison@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ucdkkv1c64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:34:11 +0200, Laura Carlson  
<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> The question that needs a clear and unambiguous answer is, what is the
> step-by-step procedure for a working group member to get a proposal
> into the spec?

So far it seems that if there's agreement between implementors and authors  
that a certain problem needs solving that is considered to be in scope  
something to solve the problem will be added to the specification. Which  
is then incrementally evolved by author and implementor feedback over the  
next few years.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2008 10:55:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:18 GMT