W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2008

Re: How will the response from the pfwg on alt be dealt with?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:05:01 -0600
Message-ID: <47B5E25D.3010104@w3.org>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>

Steven Faulkner wrote:
>[...]
>  >As I said, this looks like a design issue; there is somewhere
>  >around 2 years of back-log on those in front of the PFWG request.
> 
> It seems somewhat incongruous that a decision to change something can be 
> made at the editors whim, but there is a 2 year back log to
> even begin reversing the change.

Yes, it's pretty unfortunate.

We're working on changing that situation, but that's where we are.

To re-iterate:

If the pace isn't satisfactory to you, you're welcome to
  (a) come to a teleconference and argue for higher priority
  (b) ask Al Gilman to follow up


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 19:05:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:25 GMT