Steven Faulkner wrote: >[...] > >As I said, this looks like a design issue; there is somewhere > >around 2 years of back-log on those in front of the PFWG request. > > It seems somewhat incongruous that a decision to change something can be > made at the editors whim, but there is a 2 year back log to > even begin reversing the change. Yes, it's pretty unfortunate. We're working on changing that situation, but that's where we are. To re-iterate: If the pace isn't satisfactory to you, you're welcome to (a) come to a teleconference and argue for higher priority (b) ask Al Gilman to follow up -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 19:05:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:10:25 GMT