- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:07:55 -0600
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Steven Faulkner wrote: > Hi Dan, > I guess some of us a wondering whether what is an unambiguous formal > response from the PF WG in regards to the current HTML5 spec being out > of step with WAI, WCAG 1 & 2 and the PF WG thinking on the alt. i.e. the > alt should be required not optional, is going to be dealt with. Yes, I expect it will. I have answered your questions to the best of my ability. I can't imagine what more you want. As I said, this looks like a design issue; there is somewhere around 2 years of back-log on those in front of the PFWG request. I expect the WG to get to it in due course. I was just on a call with Al Gilman and he didn't bring this up; I infer that he's satisfied with the rate of progress. If the pace isn't satisfactory to you, you're welcome to (a) come to a teleconference and argue for higher priority (b) ask Al Gilman to follow up -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 17:08:03 UTC