noted EOM [was: Re: summary issue closed]

Thanks, Dan for the FYI Cc: and the process reminders.

Thanks, Josh for keeping after this.

Al

On 1 Apr 2008, at 1:21 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> I was out of the office when this thread started
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Mar/0048.html
>
> I'm happy to see it mostly took care of itself...
>
> If you want to contact the HTML WG chair, keep
> in mind that there are more than one of us.
>
> Also, it helps me if you keep Mike Smith in
> the loop.
>
> Also, as this regards accessibility, I'd like to be
> sure the WAI PF leads are in the loop; Al
> and/or Michael, please acknowledge receipt.
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:56 +0100, Joshue O Connor wrote:
>> Laura Carlson wrote:
>>> Issue 32 was not resolved or closed. It was rejected:
>>>
>>>> Rejected by editor due to unclear problem description. [Ian  
>>>> Hickson]"
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/32
>>
>> The issue will be rewritten for the sake of clarity and then re- 
>> submitted.
>
> Thanks, Josh.
>
> Feel free to use the same issue number when you re-submit;
> I don't see any reason to make a new/separate issue.
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>