W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2007

Re: conventions and mailing lists and offlist topics and so forth

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: ddailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
Cc: david <david.dailey@sru.edu>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0705022158250.16299@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Wed, 2 May 2007, ddailey wrote:
> 
> Sorry for getting carried away by the spirit of it all with the 
> plus-one-ing ! I blame Dave Hyatt for the provocation, but will try to 
> behave myself in the future.

Great, thanks!


> As long as we're offlist -- I would really like to know if what I 
> proposed, concerning issue tracking, in the W3c archive list would work 
> at all for you. I believe I cc-ed Dave Hyatt.

I'd work with whatever issue tracking we end up with. In my opinion an 
issue tracking system has several key requirements:

 * It should automatically track e-mails on an issue so that there is 
   always a complete log of all mail on a topic.

 * It should enable people to clearly summarise all arguments in one 
   place.

 * It should allow for a clear statement of the current state of the issue 
   (resolved, open, etc).

But I'll let you and Dan and everyone else sort out what we actually use. 
I don't really have the bandwidth to figure out what the system is. So 
long as it does the above, it'll be fine. :-)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 22:03:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:07 GMT