W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2007

Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:58:07 -0700
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <CD608137-9D08-45E2-9283-BCF956565C40@apple.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>

On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> 2007-08-24 21:11:36 +0200 Maciej Stachowiak:
>> Can we end this silliness now? You have spent more time  
>> complaining  about
>> people expressing their opinions in outside forums than in  actually
>> providing research or close review that would help improve  the  
>> spec. I have
>> tried to give you the benefit of the doubt but it is  starting to  
>> seem like
>> your only goal here is to create conflict.
> «Free speech» does not mean «Freedom to speak on behalf». The latter  
> is a «right» one naturally should have the sense to «sacrifice» in a  
> consensus driven work group.

You consider it speaking on the group's behalf to say what I  
personally think is *likely* to happen with the spec in a bug tracker  
for my own project? Just because I happen to be a member of the group?  
If so, then it is impossible for me to both be a member of this  
Working Group and do my job. I hope the chairs think otherwise.

Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 23:58:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:12 UTC