W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2005

RE: Infowebml Feedback: odd schema document

From: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:08:17 +0100
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>, "'Danny Ayers'" <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <001301c5f4cc$d556fa00$6c7ba8c0@hans>
Hi Dan,


Thanks for this correction! Tools like cwm are too complex for me, because
you need to install esoteric stuff like Python. And there seems not to be
another tool to check whether an OWL Full file is correct. I use the W3C RDF
Validator a lot, but that doesn't do that. I recently started using
SemanticWorks from Altova, but it swallowed the mistake without protest. Ah
well, I am too impatient I guess.





Hans Teijgeler

ISO 15926 specialist

www.InfowebML.ws <http://www.infowebml.ws/> 


phone +31-72-509 2005      


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 6:31 AM
To: Dan Connolly
Cc: www-archive@w3.org; hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl; Danny Ayers
Subject: Re: Infowebml Feedback: odd schema document


On Nov 29, 2005, at 12:24 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Wow... I just discovered this work on STEP-in-OWL.

> http://www.infowebml.ws/description/ontology-for-data-model/ontology- 

> for-data-model.htm


> I tried to grab the namespace document to look at it with some tools...

>   http://www.15926.org/dm-2005-11


> and I got a page with a link to an RDF document.

> http://www.15926.org/dm-2005-11/ontology-for-data-model.rdf


I tried to read it with cwm* and got:


ValueError: invalid literal for long():


and sure enough, I see:









which is almost certainly not what you meant. I expect you meant






* http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html



Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 10:08:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:54 UTC