On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 15:41 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: [...] > I think there is a common set of concepts and terminology that apply to > protocols independend of choice of specific syntax such as XML syntax, > and I consequently suggest that the first part of a finding on protocol > evolution and re-use provides a clear and detailed discussion of common > concepts and terminology including a general discussion of the impact > of design decisions relative to these concepts, without recommendations > towards making specific design decisions. Are you interested to help write such a thing? I'm not sure there is a common set of concepts... I hope to look at a number of specific cases before attempting to generalize... but I agree that looking at protocol evolution in general is more interesting than just looking at extending and versioning (sic) XML vocabularies. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 16:09:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 08:09:37 GMT