started to read RDFTM: Survey; looks great so far!

I have only managed to read the 1st couple sections,
but I thought I'd send this message rather than wait
until I have my comments all packaged up, lest I never
get around to that... I'm still figuring out when to
send directly to the WG and when not to, Ralph; feel
free to forward/cite/whatever.

RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals 
posted by DanC at 2005-02-25 00:05 (+)

        DanC: Editor's Draft 24 February 2005
        DanC: "RDF only allows a single identifier." should be "single
        type of identifier"?
        DanC: "the current version of ISO 13250 does not allow this but
        the revised version will." begs for a pointer to "the revised
        version" or some schedule for it
        DanC: 2.3 Test Cases. yum yum!
        DanC: the organization of this document is very nice.
        Chronological introduction of the approaches reviewed, etc.
        DanC: I have only managed to read sections 1 and 2, though


http://swig.xmlhack.com/2005/02/25/2005-02-25.html#1109289925.536697

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E