Re: webarch abstract: extra para?

/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say:
| I'm surprised to see "information space" and that
| whole 1st para in the abstract in
|   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/
|
| I had these 2 questions projected and I brought them
| to the group's attention:
|
| * I left out "information systems"; is it needed in the abstract?
| * I left out "people and software retrieve, create, display, analyze,
| relate, and reason about resources"; is it needed in the abstract?"
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/att-0003/webarch-28sep-comments.html
| <- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#webarch-dc
|
| Did you re-think it or something?

No, I kept the original first para around while I was crafting the
second, then forgot to delete the first. A clear and obvious error on
my part.

| I thought we were aiming at just the "The World Wide
| Web uses relatively simple technologies ..." paragraph.

Yep.

/me ^k^k^k^k...

That's all we've got...now :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The effects of weakness are
http://nwalsh.com/            | inconceivable, and more prodigious than
                              | those of the most violent
                              | passions.--Cardinal De Retz