- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:40 +0000 (GMT)
- To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
In IRC today, Jim Ley suggested decoupling the annotating UI from the RDF repository. [[ <JibberJim> Greg, I think the most important things to agree are the vocabulary for the annotations themselves. <JibberJim> and the way of telling the central resource about metadata, either posting raw RDF, or posting a link to some remote rdf, or posting a link to a jpeg containing RDF. ]] http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2004-01-15.html#T12-14-46 Does that make sense to people? it would mean that any tool could post to the server (once we have decided on an RDF vocab), although Greg's could remain the 'default' UI tool. I offered to temporarily host a put server which would simply take RDF and put it on a webserver for others to harvest. Another possibility is to put images on such a server with embedded RDF in them (I'm a bit more reluctant to do that). One possibility is to use Annotea. I'm happy for someone else to take this on if they would rather. If I did it it would have to be temporary. cheers Libby ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 09:11:47 UTC