W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [w3photo] image regions vocab update

From: Morten Frederiksen <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:22:53 +0100
To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
Message-Id: <04022700225302.01107@zonker.mfd-consult.dk>

Hi all,

On Thursday 26 February 2004 20:37, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
> After today's chat I updated the image region vocabulary
> proposal
Looks really nice.

> - changed temporary namespace to
>   http://www.w3.org/2004/02/image-regions#
Great. Nothing like a w3 namespace to inspire confidence...

> - focus is on regions now, I removed the redundant terms
>   Image, depicts, depiction, width, height. The DL version
>   "redefines" Jim's width and height, this may be wrong, as
>   they now have a domain of foaf:Image and the range is
>   xsd:positiveInteger. we can still create imreg:width and
>   imreg:height.
I think we should, since otherwise inference-capable system will get 
confused, and think a region is an image that can be displayed - like we 
talked about earlier.

The prose for coords property is really hard to understand (what's the exact 
difference between "separated" and "delimited"?). I know it's probably based 
on my own bad write-up, but still! :-)
An example for each region type would go a long way.

This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:24:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:42:36 UTC