Hi. After today's chat I updated the image region vocabulary proposal at [1]-[5]: - changed temporary namespace to http://www.w3.org/2004/02/image-regions# - focus is on regions now, I removed the redundant terms Image, depicts, depiction, width, height. The DL version "redefines" Jim's width and height, this may be wrong, as they now have a domain of foaf:Image and the range is xsd:positiveInteger. we can still create imreg:width and imreg:height. regards, benjamin [1] RDFS+OWL version: summary (HTML) http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/image_spec_rdfsowl [2] RDFS+OWL version: Documentation (HTML) http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/image_doc_rdfsowl [3] RDFS+OWL version: serialization (RDF/XML): http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/specs/ontology8 [4] OWL DL version: summary (HTML) http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/image_spec_dl [5] OWL DL version: serialization (RDF/XML): http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/specs/ontology7 -- Benjamin Nowack Kruppstr. 82-100 45145 Essen, Germany ================= This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: helpReceived on Thursday, 26 February 2004 14:43:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 April 2011 20:21:45 GMT