- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:22:25 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:41:36PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Sorry, I intended it to be implicit in my message that I'd like to raise > > an issue. My apologies for not making that clear. > > A new web architecture issue? I still don't see one. EPRs are structured identifiers, yet not URIs. You don't see a problem with that? There's a bunch of other issues too, I was just focusing on what I felt to be the most obvious one. Consider wsa:To and how it supercedes the HTTP Request-URI, or wsa:Action and how it supercedes the HTTP request method... > > Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. But I think I'm working within the > > bounds of documented process to request that the TAG consider > > architectural issues with member submissions. Am I mistaken? > > Yes. The TAG has no responsibility for submissions, as far as I know. *shrug* Well, the TAG hears appeals of rejected submissions. Mark.
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 02:21:09 UTC